Considering the environmental surroundings when interpreting experimental results

Animal experiments

Research published in F1000Research highlights an important issue regarding animal experiments, especially behavioural ones. The results of these studies could be flawed because unforeseen environmental changes are often not considered, even though they could influence the experimental results. We invited one of the authors of the article, Rupshi Mitra (RM), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, and…

Reflections of Peer Review Week 2018

Peer Review

Well, what a week it has been! It is fair to say that each and every corner of the scholarly publishing world has been abuzz with questions, conversations, and debates, helping to bring a new level of transparency to the state of peer review in 2018. Here at F1000, we pride ourselves on openness and…

Where are all the reviewers? Interacting with F1000Research’s global peer reviewers using Plotly

Plotly

This week is Peer Review week, and given this year’s theme of ‘Diversity and Inclusion’ we took the opportunity to evaluate just how diverse and inclusive our peer review model is, looking at the geographical spread of F1000Research reviewers; the equal opportunities we provide for early career researchers; and the gender balance among F1000Research published reviewers.

Maximising the 3Rs impact of NC3Rs-funded research: author and reviewer Q&A

A method article published on NC3Rs gateway on F1000Research describes the process of making whole brain organotypic slices and explains how this method can be used to reduce and refine the use of animals in Alzheimer’s disease research. In this Q&A, authors Cara Croft and Wendy Noble (CC and WN), and reviewer Claire Durrant (CD), talk about the 3Rs (replacing, reducing and refining); the NC3Rs gateway and their experience of open peer review.