Viral views and biased beliefs
27 September, 2013 | Samuel Winthrop |
|
|
Biased beliefs for breakfast: how the scientific record is distorted by presumptions stronger than the evidence. https://t.co/aOm4SeLqns
— F1000Prime (@F1000) September 24, 2013
Is a structural high-tech view of HIV too good to be true? https://t.co/FhD8zJIGPo
— F1000Prime (@F1000) September 23, 2013
Size doesn't matter: "testicular volume does not affect sperm retrieval rates." https://t.co/NqmWjtsn2N
— F1000Prime (@F1000) September 24, 2013
And from elsewhere on Twitter…
The British defence science 'library of fungi' pic.twitter.com/SxzhdalaLa
— Jon Agar (@jon_agar) September 26, 2013
Does it make sense to group cancers together because they all grow in the same part of the body? DNA may be better. https://t.co/RSTRERfaoW
— L.A. Times Science (@latimesscience) September 26, 2013
HeLa cell undergoing metaphase. Super-resolution image: DNA (blue), microtubules (green) . https://t.co/2Iqmggak5O pic.twitter.com/8ZwzqxTDAS
— Molecular Probes (@MolProbes) September 26, 2013
|