News in a nutshell
| 2 August, 2010 | Adie Chan |
6
|
|
PLoS's open access logo, Wikimedia commons
Open access arguments
The US House of Representatives subcommittee heard arguments on Thursday (July 29) from both sides of a new bill that would require federal agencies that fund more than $100 million of research to provide public access to the results and publications that result from that research.
While scientists and patients
|
|
previous post
“…the 220 million-year-old shrimp has now been spotted periodically for the last 6 years.”
So, would a shrimp this old still be considered fresh? 😉
To Allan Alder, If the taxpayers didn’t fund the research the private sector journals (some of which are commercial) to which you refer would have nothing to print. Why are the journals afraid of transparency of all public funded research. Something to hide?
what about global warming?
do you think really it’s because of carbon dioxide?