Comments on: Where the streets have no name http://blog.f1000.com/2009/08/04/where-the-streets-have-no-name/ Post-publication peer review Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:15:25 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: rpg http://blog.f1000.com/2009/08/04/where-the-streets-have-no-name/#comment-17 rpg Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:53:37 +0000 http://blog.f1000.com/?p=42#comment-17 The image is non-clickable: that's deliberate. You're right Alejandro. All those things could be done. It hasn't escaped our notice... The image is non-clickable: that’s deliberate.

You’re right Alejandro. All those things could be done. It hasn’t escaped our notice…

]]> By: Alejandro Montenegro-Montero http://blog.f1000.com/2009/08/04/where-the-streets-have-no-name/#comment-16 Alejandro Montenegro-Montero Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:47:29 +0000 http://blog.f1000.com/?p=42#comment-16 I can't seem to click on the image. Is it just me? It may be interesting to know the "most evaluated authors" or institutions at F1000. I guess this could also be done by area of research. I can’t seem to click on the image. Is it just me?

It may be interesting to know the “most evaluated authors” or institutions at F1000. I guess this could also be done by area of research.

]]> By: rpg http://blog.f1000.com/2009/08/04/where-the-streets-have-no-name/#comment-15 rpg Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:02:29 +0000 http://blog.f1000.com/?p=42#comment-15 Thomson is using everything—for whatever value of 'everything' you care to name. We're currently publishing evaluations for ~1.5% of the PubMedded literature. So yeah, our dataset is smaller. But it's quality :) Thomson is using everything—for whatever value of ‘everything’ you care to name. We’re currently publishing evaluations for ~1.5% of the PubMedded literature. So yeah, our dataset is smaller.

But it’s quality :)

]]> By: Nige http://blog.f1000.com/2009/08/04/where-the-streets-have-no-name/#comment-14 Nige Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:26:44 +0000 http://blog.f1000.com/?p=42#comment-14 I am peering that that screengrab. Are your freuqncy rates per author high enough to do this? I realise that they will add up per insitution, but Thomson, for its faults, is using a much bigger dataset. I am peering that that screengrab. Are your freuqncy rates per author high enough to do this? I realise that they will add up per insitution, but Thomson, for its faults, is using a much bigger dataset.

]]>